Updated 4/29/14, 5/13/14
In an editorial dated 4/29/14, the Ryukyu Shimpo pleaded with President Obama to unconditionally close the Futenma U.S. Marine Corps Air Station and return, to Japan, the land that it now occupies. The current agreement to close it is based on the condition that the base would be relocated in Henoko, in northern Okinawa. (For background on the Futenma-Henoko MCAS issue, click here.)
This issue is complex. It involves pacts between the U.S. and the Japanese government for the military defense of Japan and the surrounding region. Okinawa, where many of the U.S. bases are located, is caught in the middle, between a rock and a hard place. Okinawan government leaders, too, are damned if they do and damned if they don’t. Should they support the pacts between the U.S. and their national government, or should they bow to the mandate of the majority of Okinawan citizens who, in their desperate desire to reduce the U.S. military presence in their homeland, refuse to accept the political compromises?
The hearts and emotions of all those, in Okinawa and the world, who value peace and self-determination are with the people of Okinawa who are protesting the continuation of the massive U.S. military presence in Okinawa. The reality, however, involves much more than these ideals, with a dangerous geopolitical standoff at the epicenter.
When all is said and done, the fundamental issue is one of fair play, and the finger points to the Japanese national government as well as to the U.S. military: Why should one small prefecture in Japan carry so much of the military defense burden for the entire region?
If removal of bases is not an option in the foreseeable future, then the two powers need to move in the direction of balance, distributing the bases throughout Japan in a pattern that spreads the load fairly among the different prefectures. Continue reading











































